Multiple Glomus Tumors: Recognition and Diagnosis - SKINmed 2002;1(2):94-8.

 

Antonio Macedo D`Acri, MD, MSc; Marcia Ramos-e-Silva, MD, PhD; Carlos Basílio-de-Oliveira, MD, PhD;Ana Cerqueira, MD;Daniela Monteiro, MD;Giovana Pretti, MD;Cristiana Longo, MD;Érica Monteiro, MD

 

From the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ); Sector of Dermatology, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho HUCFF-UFRJ and School of Medicine, UFRJ; Sector of Pathology, Gaffree Guinle Hospital, Universidade do Rio de Janeiro; Hospital Jesus, Rio de Janeiro; Policlínica Geral do Rio de Janeiro; Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil

Background. Glomus tumor is a benign neoplasm of uncommon occurrence in daily practice, more frequently observed as a single painful lesion, at the distal phalanges of the fingers. Multiple presentation is very rare, with fewer than 200 reports, usually presenting as small angiomatous lesions with discrete pain.

Objectives. The study’s objective was to analyze the epidemiologic, clinical, therapeutic, and histopathologic aspects in a series of six cases of multiple glomus tumors.

Results. All patients were men, between 12–45 years of age. The tumor was congenital or appeared between 3–25 years of age. The clinical picture oscillated between three to 10 lesions, as macules, nodules, or tumors, with colors varying from bluish, brown-bluish, violet, to normochromic. The lesions were detected in the trunk and one or more members, not affecting the head, hands, and feet. Pain was discrete or absent. Incisional biopsy for histopathologic evaluation with the hematoxylin-eosin staining confirmed the diagnosis of glomus tumor in all cases. It showed the characteristic glomus cells and vascular spaces. The complete excision of the tumorous plaque was performed in one patient and a complex corrective procedure is still to be performed for one aberrant tumor in another case. The other patients received advice about their disease and were asked to periodically return.

Conclusion. Because this is a very uncommon illness, the present series allowed the demonstration of the wide variety of epidemiologic and clinical aspects described in the literature, with the presentation of elements that may improve its recognition and diagnosis.
(SKINmed. 2002;1:94–98)
© Le Jacq.

Glomus tumor is defined as a painful and solitary lesion generally located, at the subungual portion of the finger 1, 2 ; however, it has been detected in all skin surfaces and on occasion in extracutaneous locations such as muscles, bones, nerves, blood vessels, and internal organs. 3–7 The disease may occur as solitary glomus tumors (SGTs) or multiple glomus tumors (MGTs), which may present in three different patterns: regional, disseminated, or congenital, in plaques. 8 There are also exceptional reports of tumors with proliferative invasive behavior and cases with sarcomatous degeneration (glomangiosarcoma). 9, 10
Described by Pierre Masson in 1924, glomus tumor is an uncommon disease in daily practice, although more than a thousand cases may be gathered from the literature. 11, 12 Multiple presentation, observed for the first time by Picard 13 in 1931, is very rare with less than 200 reports, and no previous publication was found in Brazil.

 

Case Reports
We collected six cases of patients with MGTs, observed in five different hospitals in the city of Rio de Janeiro (cases 1–5) and one in the city of São Paulo (case 6). All resulted from spontaneous consultation, except case 5, found in a search among 23,000 skin lesion histopathology examination results in a general hospital, Hospital São Vicente de Paulo, Rio de Janeiro ( Figures 15 ). The Table presents the epidemiologic and clinical aspects of the six patients with MGTs.
Ultrasound scans, used for tumorous delimitation in cases 1 and 2, demonstrated hypoechoic masses in the subcutaneous region, without reaching deeper levels. In case 2, the digestive endoscopy performed for survey of the attack of the alimentary canal had a negative result.
Incisional biopsy for histopathologic evaluation confirmed the diagnosis of glomus tumor in the entire series. In case 1 the complete excision of the tumorous plaque and flap rotation was performed. The aberrant tumor in case 2 justified a complex corrective procedure, still to be performed. The other patients received information about their disease and were periodically observed.
The pathologic exam showed a similar architectural pattern in all cases, with abundant vascular spaces, sometimes dilated, and glomus cells organized, sometimes in concentric rows, other times in strings, and masses with increased cellularity. The stroma was dense, without deposits of myxoid material. Flat muscular fibers were observed in a focal arrangement in case 1. Mitosis figures, mastocytes, and nerve fibers were not visualized by the hematoxylin-eosin staining. In the immunohistochemistry performed in case 1, the glomus cells exhibited reactivity to antibodies, to smooth muscle-specific actin, and to vimentin, without showing a reaction to desmin ( Figure 6 ).

 

Table. Epidemiologic and Clinical Aspects in Six Patients With Multiple Glomic Tumor


Sex

First Appearance

Present Age (Years )

Race

Type

Number of Lesions and Location

Pain

Family History

Patient’s Origin

Male

Age 25

36

B

Regional

Plate comprising 10 lenticular violet nodules on left buttock

No

None

PGRJ

Male

Congenital

29

B

Diffuse

Four soft tumor normochromic lesions ranging from 10–20 cm in diameter on back and right inguinal region

Yes

None

PGRJ

Male

Age 3

12

W

Diffuse

Eight lesions with maculae and bluish lenticular nodules on back, left arm, right forearm, and legs

Yes

None

H Jesus

Male

Congenital

24

W

Diffuse

Ten lesions as bluish lenticulonummular nodules on back and arms

Yes

Father and aunt on father’s side

HSVP

Male

Age 25

45

W

Regional

Three lesions as bluish lenticular nodules on arms

No

None

Private Clinic

Male

Age 15

16

M

Regional

Eight lesions as brown-bluish lenticular nodules on arm and right forearm

Yes

None

EPM

B=black; W=white; M=mixed; PGRJ=Policlínica Geral do Rio de Janeiro; H Jesus=Hospital Jesus; HSVP=Hospital São Vicente de Paulo; EPM=Escola Paulista de Medicina

 

Discussion
Although statistics are scarce, the glomus tumor is relatively infrequent, representing 1.6% of the cases in a series of 500 primary tumors of soft body parts 14 and 1%–4.5% of hand tumors in different evaluations. 15 In the wide context of a general hospital such as the São Vicente de Paulo Hospital, we found eight glomus tumors (0.035%), with one MGT case (0.0043%), in 23,000 histopathologic exams, demonstrating that the disease is really very rare.
In the early stages of study of glomus tumor one hypothesis was a preponderance of the single presentation in women and multiple lesions in men, which did not persist after a study of large series. 16, 17 Surprisingly, our sample consisted only of men. MGT usually appears before age 21, during childhood or adolescence, with occasional congenital emergence. 17, 18 The diagnosis in black individuals is infrequent, perhaps because the greater number of articles are from Europe and the United States where the white population prevails. 19 The familial occurrence of MGT shows itself through dominant autosomal inheritance with incomplete penetration of the regional form in some patients. 18, 20

Solitary or multiple glomus tumor may present with different patterns: regional, disseminated, or congenital in plaques.
As observed in our series, MGT presents varied clinic forms with stains, wheals, and nodules—isolated or in confluent plaques—of bluish, red, purple, or brown color, almost always less than 3 cm in diameter. 16–18 Larger tumorous lesions (as in case 2) or telangiectatic plaques are eventually found. 16, 17, 21 In the multiple form the number of lesions vary, from less than 10 to 90, although a record of a case with 500 lesions exists. 16, 17, 22 The significant, painful symptomatology is certainly the main diagnostic element in SGT; in contrast, in MGT the algesic manifestations are generally discreet, if present at all. 16, 18, 23 Painful and painless lesions can coexist in the same individual, and also, instead of pain, local itching may be experienced. 16, 17, 24
The distribution of the tumors on the skin is random, usually on the trunk and members; there is a balance in the literature among the number of diffuse and regional presentations, those restricted to one member or a cutaneous segment. 16, 17 The congenital form in plaques is infrequent, with fewer than 20 reports in the literature. 25 The subungual presentation, usually found in SGT, is not usually detected in the multiple form. 2, 17, 26 The association of tegumentary and visceral lesions is extremely rare, mentioned in only one patient. 2, 16, 27 Usually the disease presents stable behavior, with the eventual appearance of new tumors being related to small traumatisms, repeated pregnancy, or appearing spontaneously. 16, 28 Although less common, partial regression of the lesions was noticed in one case. 29
The association with other illnesses is not usual; a concurrence was described with multiple neurofibromatosis, 30 Gardner-Diamond syndrome (autoerythrocytic sensitization), 31 Kasabach-Merritt syndrome (thrombocytopenia by entrapping of platelets in voluminous cavernous hemangiomas), 32 and Coats’ disease (progressive exudative chronic retinopathy). 33 The main differential diagnosis for MGT would be the several hemangiomas, especially the blue rubber bleb nevus (multiple cavernous hemangioma) that occurs with cutaneous and digestive lesions, as well as of the nervous system, with frequent hemorrhages. 34
Among the imaging methods, ultrasound scans and magnetic resonance imaging are particularly useful for the superficial and deep delimitation of the tumors, as well as for the location of occult painful lesions. 35, 36 Angiography is currently less often used due to its invasive nature, a certain technical difficulty, and high cost. 36 The simple x-ray offers little information, detecting merely a major increase in soft parts, voluminous tumors, or rare lesions adjacent to bones that cause destruction of bone fabric by compressive growth. 2, 26, 37
The histopathologic diagnosis of glomus tumor is made by the discovery of the glomus cells—rounded or edgy, sometimes fusiform, with pale cytoplasm, and a large central nucleus. These cells organize themselves in proliferations of variable density that vary from masses with intense cellularity to dispersed cells in strings and small agglomerates. Concurrently, vascular spaces with a single layer of endothelial, flat, and prolonged cells are found, ranging from small clefts to wide spaces. The stroma oscillates between scarce to abundant, with occasional areas of myxoid degeneration. The neoplasm is usually well delimited, with an eventual pseudo-capsule from the tissue reaction, although with sporadic reports of infiltrative tumors, poorly delimited. Mastocytes and myelinated and nonmyelinated nerve fibers are found surrounding the neoplasia in varying quantities. 2, 38–40
The histopathologic classification proposed in 1988, 41 based on 507 analyzed cases, suggests the following division: glomus tumor (prevalence of glomus cells), glomangioma (intense vascular component), and glomangiomyoma (presence of smooth muscular fibers among the glomus cells). The MGTs are almost always richly vascularized, with our sample comprising six glomangiomas The glomus cells are well characterized as modified smooth muscular cells. They originate from the cutaneous glomus, arteriovenous anastomoses, which are present in the dermis and observed mainly in the hands and feet. 38, 42 This identification is confirmed by the immunohistochemistry—since the glomic cells react to muscle-specific actin and vimentin, but not to desmin—and by electron microscopy, with the presence of basal lamina around the cells, pyknotic vesicles adjacent to the plasmatic membrane, fine filaments arranged in strips, and dense intracytoplasmic bodies. 38–40, 42, 43
Although it is believed that the glomus tumor is derived from glomic cells, it has been speculated that undistinguished mesenchymal cells, under unknown stimulation, may originate glomus tumors, particularly multiple lesions or in visceral locations. 38–40
The therapeutic management of MGT consists of surgical removal of the lesions (when painful or unaesthetic), providing information about the illness to the patient, and periodic observation. 44 Lasers have also been used experimentally in the management of MGT, 45 as well as sclerosant agents, 46, 47 electron beam irradiation, 48 and infrared coagulation. 49 The current trend has been the combination of several methods, seeking the best therapeutic and aesthetic result. 36
As glomus tumors are an uncommon illness, the present series of six patients allowed the demonstration of the wide variety of epidemiologic, clinical, and histopathologic aspects described in the literature, with the presentation of elements that may help its recognition and diagnosis.
Acknowledgments: The authors wish to thank Augusto Teixeira, Christina Guerra, Olga Harris, Cláudia Maia, and Omar Santos for contributions in the evaluation of the patients.

 

References
1 Holzerbg M. Glomus tumor of the nail. Arch Dermatol. 1992;128:160–162.
2 D’Acri AM, Luz FB, Ferreira JA. Tumor gl&ocaron;mico. An Bras Dermatol. 1994;69:405–411.
3 Caccamo D, Kaneko M, Gordon RE. Glomus tumor of the stomach. Mt Sinai J Med. 1987;54:344–347.
4 Bandoli JG, Basilio-de-Oliveira CA. Tumor gl&ocaron;mico intra-ósseo. F Méd (BR). 1990;100:155–158.
5 Smith KA, Mackinnon SE, Macauley RJB. Glomus tumor originating in the radial nerve: a case report. J Hand Surg. 1992;17A:665–667.
6 Murphy RX, Rachman RA. Extradigital glomus tumor as a cause of knee pain. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;92:1371–1374.
7 D’Acri AM. Tumor gl&ocaron;mico: localizac&acaron;o digital x extradigital. An Bras Dermatol. 1998;73:582.
8 Landthaler M, Braun-Falco O, Eckert F. Congenital multiple plaquelike glomus tumors. Arch Dermatol. 1990;126:1203–1207.
9 Aiba M, Hirayma A, Kuramochi S. Gloman-giosarcoma in a glomus tumor. An immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study. Cancer. 1988;61:1467–1471.
10 Gould EW, Manivel JC, Saavedra JA. Locally infiltrative glomus tumors and glomangiosarcomas: a clinical, ultrastructural and immunohistochemical study. Cancer. 1990;65:310–318.
11 Masson P. Le glomus neuromyo-arteriel des regions tactiles et ses tumeurs. Lyon Chir. 1924;21:257–280.
12 D’Acri AM. Tumor Gl&ocaron;mico: Contribuic&acaron;o ao Estudo %sol;Glomus Tumour: Contribution to Its Knowledge [thesis in Portuguese]. Niterói, Brazil: Universidade Federal Fluminense; 1997;.
13 Picard H. über seltene tumoren am nagelbett (neuromyoarterielle glomustumoren). Zentralbl Chir. 1931;58:2133–2135.
14 Shugart RR, Soule EH, Johnson EW Jr. Glomus Tumor. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1963;117:334–340.
15 Glicenstein J, Ohana J, Leclerq C. Tumours of the Hand. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin; 1988;136–139.
16 Parsons ME, Russo G, Fucich L. Multiple glomus tumors. Int J Dermatol. 1997;36:894–900.
17 Iqbal A, Cormack GC, Scerri G. Hereditary multiple glomangiomas. Br J Plast Surg. 1998;51:32–37.
18 Beasley SW, Mel J, Chow CW. Hereditary multiple glomus tumours. Arch Dis Child. 1986;61:801–802.
19 D’Acri AM, Gaspar NK. Tumor gl&ocaron;mico: estudo retrospectivo clínicohistopatológico de 44 casos. An Bras Dermatol. 1998;73:307–311.
20 Tran LP, Velanovich V, Kaufmann CR. Familial multiple glomus tumors: report of a pedigree and literature review. Ann Plast Surg. 1994;32:89–92.
21 Hollingsworth JF, Ochsner JL. A multifocal diffuse glomus tumor: case report and review of the literature. Am Surg. 1972;38:161–167.
22 Larsen FS, Hage E. Multiple glomus tumours. A report of a family in Denmark. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh). 1979;59:180–182.
23 Gordon B, Hyman AB. Multiple nontender glomus tumors. Report of a case with 33 lesions. Arch Dermatol. 1961;83:640–643.
24 Rudolph R. Familial multiple glomangiomas. Ann Plast Surg. 1993;30:183–185.
25 Moss T, Don PC, Weinberg JM. Congenital multiple anular glomus tumors. Acta Derm Venereol. 1998;78:154–155.
26 Nakamura K. Multiple glomus tumors associated with arteriovenous fistulas and with nodular. lesions of the finger joints. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90:675–683.
27 Brindley GV. Glomus tumor of the mediastinum. J Thoracic Surg. 1949;18:417–420.
28 Laymon CW, Peterson WC. Glomangioma (glomus tumor). A clinicopathologic study with special reference to multiple lesions appearing during pregnancy. Arch Dermatol. 1965;92:509–513.
29 Kato N, Kumakiri M, Okhrwara A. Localized form of multiple glomus tumors: report of the first case showing partial involution. J Dermatol. 1990;17:423–428.
30 Okada O, Demitsu T, Manabe M. A case of multiple subungual glomus tumors associated with neurofibromatosis type 1. J Dermatol. 1999;26:535–537.
31 Pearson B, Mazza JJ. Gardner-Diamond syndrome with multiple glomus tumors. Arch Dermatol. 1975;111:893–895.
32 McEvoy BF, Waldman PM, Tye MJ. Multiple hamartomatous glomus tumors of the skin. Arch Dermatol. 1971;104:188–191.
33 Bhushan M, Kumar S, Griffiths CEM. Multiple glomus tumours, Coats’ disease and fibroblast growth factor. Brit J Dermatol. 1997;134:454–456.
34 Chandon J P, Micco C, Lebreuil G. Blue rubber bleb naevus et glomangiomatoses. Unicité ou dualité?. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1978;105:123–130.
35 Fornage BD. Glomus tumors in the fingers: diagnosis with US. Radiology. 1988;167:183–185.
36 Keefer CJ, Brantley B, Delozier JR III. Familial infiltrative glomangiomas: diagnosis and treatment. J Craniofac Surg. 1996;7:145–147.
37 Noor MA, Masbah O, Lumpur K. Synchronous glomus tumors in a distal digit: a case report. J Hand Surg (Am). 1997;22:508–510.
38 Goodman TF, Abele DC. Multiple glomus tumors. A clinical and electron microscopic study. Arch Dermatol. 1971;103:11–23.
39 Pepper MC, Laubenheimer R, Cripps DJ. Multiple glomus tumors. J Cutan Pathol. 1977;4:244–257.
40 Tsuneyoshi M, Enjoji M. Glomus tumor. A clinicopathology and electron microscopy study. Cancer. 1982;50:1601–1607.
41 Enzinger FM, Weiss SW. Soft Tissue Tumours. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Co.; 1988;581–595.
42 Goodman TF. Fine structure of the cells of the Suquet-Hoyer canal. J Invest Dermatol. 1972;59:363–369.
43 Herbst WM, Nakayama K, Hornstein OP. Glomus tumours of the skin: an immunohistochemical investigation of the expression of maker proteins. Br J Dermatol. 1991;124:172–176.
44 Faggioli GL, Bertoni F, Stella A. Multifocal diffuse glomus tumor. A case report of glomangiomyoma and review of the literature. Int Angiol. 1988;7:281–286.
45 Jacobi H, Härtel SL. Kongenitale familiäre plaqueförmige glomustumoren. Eine auBergewöhnnliche variante multipler regionaler glomustumoren. Hautarzt. 1996;47:387–390.
46 Siegle RJ, Spencer DM, Davis LS. Hypertonic saline destruction of multiple glomus tumors. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1994;20:347–348.
47 Vente C, Menzel S, Rupprecht R. Sklerosierung bei mutiplen familiären glomangiomen. Hautarzt. 1998;49:657–661.
48 Nishimoto K, Nishimoto M, Yamamoto S. Multiple glomus tumours: successful treatment with electron beam irradiation. Br J Dermatol. 1990;123:657–661.
49 Lever LR, Holt PJA. Multiple glomus cell tumours—treatment by infrared coagulation. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1992;17:34–35.

)

Figures

Figure f1
Figure1.Several nodules on the left buttock

Figure f2
Figure2.Giant tumors on the back

Figure f3
Figure3.Discrete nodular lesions on the forearm

Figure f4
Figure4.Large angiomatous plague on the back

Figure f5
Figure5.Multiple small nodules on the cubital area

Figure f6
Figure6.Multiple vascular spaces, some with thrombi surrounded by glomic cell proliferations